Name of Website: www.manythings.org
1. What does the application/website attempt to “teach”?
The
website attempts to teach ESL learners common English used in a typical daily
life – at least in a typical American life. Almost all of the materials are
based in an American setting and it provides practise space for ESL learners to
improve their English. Most of the content focuses on new vocabulary, listening,
pronunciation (speaking) and reading. Not much teaching emphasis on grammar and
writing is given besides quizzes and games.
2. What sort of things are the application user expected
to do with regards to learning the content?
The
user is expected to improve and perfect their language, in terms of their vocabulary,
pronunciation, listening, with a side of grammar, reading, and writing by doing
the games and activities offered on the web.
To
encourage their users in learning English every day, the website has a special
feature called the Daily Page (http://www.manythings.org/daily/). The Daily Page offers the users a
selected collection of things that they have to learn or do on that particular
day, and the content changes every day. So users have daily ‘lessons’ that they
have to complete every day and it definitely promotes students to learn and
practise their English every day. The Daily Page features the following:
·
Word/Proverb/Slang
of the Day
·
Quiz
of the Day
·
Daily
Listening
·
Daily
Pronunciation Practise
·
Daily
Vocabulary Word
·
Popular
Search Engines
·
and
Dictionary links
3. What sort of computer skills does the application
users expected to have in order to operate/access/use the application?
Reading
the About page of the website (http://www.manythings.org/e/about.html),
it states that the site design follows most of the Guidelines for Designing a
Good Website for ESL Students (http://iteslj.org/Articles/Kelly-Guidelines.html)
and that Guideline 1 is: Make your site usable by everyone if possible.
Based on Guideline 1, the creators of the
website would want their content to get through to even the novice/beginner computer
users. So the users are expected to just have the very basic skills of the
computer and Internet surfing. The most that the users would have to do is to
learn how to set up their audio device – be it speakers, headphones or
earphones – and install Java and Flash applications on their browser. If the
users find that their Internet browser is incompatible with Java or Flash – or
they just cannot seem to understand what Java or Flash is – they can still opt
for similar content in HTML form.
The website is simple and easy to use, so
it will be very easy for the users to use and learn.
4. While you are “playing”/”accessing”/”assessing” the
application, does it remind you of anything you do in a classroom, or with a
teacher, or with a fellow classmate, or in self-study?
The
Read Along section and pronunciation practise from the website really reminded
me of the activities that I did in English Class during Primary and Lower
Secondary School. Most of my English teachers asked the class to read along a
text together and we would all read together in unison. The pronunciation
practise is also very similar to what I had to do in class. Normally there
would be a few words highlighted in the text given by the teacher. The teacher
would say the words out loud and we students would repeat the word a few times
until the teacher is satisfied with our pronunciation. Then the teacher would
explain the meaning of the word to us.
The
quizzes in the website are also very much alike the cloze passages that I’ve
done in exercise books, test and exams. So the quizzes were not unfamiliar to
me and it would definitely help ESL students to get more practise by doing
these quizzes.
5. Can you pinpoint some theories of language learning
and/or teaching underlying in the application?
Upon going through the website’s
contents, I can see that there is a lot of influence from the Audiolingual
Method. This is evident through the way new vocabulary and pronunciation is
introduced. The website makes it that the new word can be repeated from two to
infinity, stressing on its pronunciation, while the student tries to repeat the
word with the correct pronunciation. The introduction words and phrases are
depended on mimicry, memorisation of set phrases, and over-learning (Brown, 2001).
The website also has some elements
of the Grammar Translation Method, especially in terms or memorising new
vocabulary and their meaning. The vocabulary exercises are disconnected from
each other and very little attention is paid to the context of text in the
grammar quizzes (Brown, 2001).
6. How well is the constructivist theory of learning
applied to the chosen website(s)?
According
to Santrock (2009), the constructivist approach
is a learner-centered approach that emphasises the importance of individuals
actively constructing their knowledge and understanding with guidance from the
teacher. Based on that definition, we can say that the website is true to the
constructivist theory in the sense that it provides accessible material for ESL
students to do their own construction of knowledge and understanding. The
students can go to this website and explore the available activities and
materials to improve their English. The teacher can help guide the students
through the website and suggest specific activities to different students,
according to which area that they need the most help in. So, the students can take
a more active role in their learning by doing more activities in the area that
they are weaker in and also explore additional knowledge that they would like
to do.
7. In 1980s and early 1990s, there was a major debate on
whether the computer was a “master” or a “slave” to the learning process
(Higgins and Johns, 1984). In relation to your evaluation – was the computer a
replacement for teachers, or merely an obedient servant to students?
A master will control you and tell
you to do things. A slave on the other hand will do anything that they are told
to do. While doing the evaluation, I found that the computer was neither the
master nor the slave. The computer did have a little control as in giving
instructions on the exercises but the website users are free to choose what
activity that they want to do. The computer also could not do everything that
the users may need, for example, live feedback on reading and pronunciation
performance. The only feedback that the website can immediately give is in
numerical, statistical form – very helpful feedback but not really a hundred
percent informative and cannot cover subjective areas that need human
interaction. Thus, the computer’s role, according to my evaluation, is as a
facilitator to language learning and teaching. The computer could not entirely
replace the role of the teacher and it also could not do everything that the
students want them to do.
I also personally believe that a
teacher’s role in language learning and teaching could not be replaced by a
computer because language is such a complex human ability and is hard to
replicate in a computer without being stilted and unnatural.
8. Would you like to use the application yourself in your
future work?
Yes/No?
Give reasons:
Yes,
because I find that the website offers a wide and rich compilation of materials
that I can use in my English lessons. The exercises are perfect to be used in
schools’ language/computer labs as it does not take long to load – thanks to
the simple design of the website.
If
I could not access the Internet at school, I could just easily download the
listening/reading exercises that are available in MP3 format, and play it on a
computer, MP3 player or CD player in my listening/reading class.
The
materials available also range in different levels of difficulty, making it
easier for the teachers to pick out the appropriate materials with the level of
their students.
Suggestions/Recommendations:
My biggest suggestion for the
website is that they highlight the Daily Page as one of their main features of
the website. Currently, the Daily Page is located inconspicuously under
‘Others’ in the main menu of the page. It is not even included in the quick
menu, located on the right side of the web page. I think that the Daily Page is
a very useful web page for students who are eager to learn English on their own,
every day. It gives them some structure as to what is to be learnt on a
particular day – as it can be overwhelming to some ESL learners when they have
to decide what they have to learn on their own. I find it a huge waste that
this Daily Page is not highlighted enough, considering the benefits students
can have from this web page.
Another suggestion that I have
for the website is that they provide instructions to their Listen and Read
Along Player – example here http://www.manythings.org/listen/loneliness/.
Even though it is a simple player to use, I did have some trouble figuring out
how the player works. It took me some time to figure out that the button with
the number on it indicates how many times the recording will repeat itself.
Lastly, I think the web designers can do a better job with the
web design, layout and organisation of the website. I know that they want to
make the website fast to load and available to everyone, but I do not think
that it would hurt to use more fun and vibrant colours for this website. Also,
a few relevant pictures would do wonders to make the web page livelier and
encouraging to students. It is important to make a website fast loading and
available to everyone, but what use is it when people are not going to use it when
they are put off by the dull colours and the absence of pictures. Reeling
people in is as important as making the website accessible to all.
References:
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An
Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Pearson Education
Company.
Kelly, C. (2000, March). Kelly - Guidelines or Designing a
Good Web Site for ESL Students. Retrieved March 12, 2012, from The Internet
TESL Journal for Teachers of English as a Second Language: http://iteslj.org/Articles/Kelly-Guidelines.html
Santrock, J. W. (2009). Educational Psychology. New
York: McGraw-Hill.
9/10
ReplyDeleteLastly, I think the web designers can do a better job with the web design, layout and organisation of the website... I agree, it is not attractive at all